Superbabi !! Heres your pics of your Y2K
#3891
Registered
#3892
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toms River, N,J
Posts: 5,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3894
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toms River, N,J
Posts: 5,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3896
Registered
You go to a #3 you better add another 125hp over what youve already added. Im sorry sometimes I went with the speedy. The boat would be deffinatly faster with a bravo type drive. The better bravo type drives didnt come along until recent years. Same with props. Bravo type prop technology has been great these last few years.
#3897
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toms River, N,J
Posts: 5,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, Konrad/Ace versus Imco SCX, what do you guys think ??? Is the Konrad a direct bolt on in place of the XR ???
Last edited by Superbabi; 08-10-2008 at 01:06 PM.
#3898
Registered
With the Konrad you still need a tranny, the trannies in the box which is good. But its also more weight. Also the transom hole is different. I think all the new Activators are rigged with the Imcos. And most are running triple diget numbers. If my timing was better and did my conversion last year instead of 5 years ago I would have the imco today. And running triple digets with the Activators.
#3899
Registered
The konrad ace comes with a 1 year warranty behind 800hp or less,does require some re-rigging and uses bam trans,proven reliable package behind 800hp,the imco scx doesn't use trans so you will have 15-20 more hp at prop,lower units probably close,both a little bulkier than std bravo,imco sold no warranty,time will tell if they can really handle some abuse.Anyone running one?I really love the y2k with the konrad smoked everthing that came my way this weekend and made it back to the dock with no broken parts