Notices

Military Hybrid Hummvee

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-15-2012, 10:19 AM
  #11  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Except this alternative So-called energy of unicorn farts and skittles is way more expensive than the real thing just more of a Joke is all.
Steve 1 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 11:28 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

All things like this arent always true. They say the Army well this vehicle could be just a test bed for the Army or could be a contractors version they are testing. MRAPS are whats being used right and will stay that way. The army would never paint anything like this either, this is a concept produced by a vendor
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 11:41 AM
  #13  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,874
Received 1,248 Likes on 541 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve 1
Except this alternative So-called energy of unicorn farts and skittles is way more expensive than the real thing just more of a Joke is all.
Thank you for causing me to make a spectacle of myself, bursting out in laughter in a crowded airport!
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 11:55 PM
  #14  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
Thank you for causing me to make a spectacle of myself, bursting out in laughter in a crowded airport!
Yeah hahaha the resident OSO Nazi is so funny. Let me ask you the question again because you must have missed it;


Originally Posted by Sydwayz
No, they're not.


Me; Yes they are. They need to save money and fuel is a big percentage of their budget. They're looking at alternative ways to burn less fuel. Is that a crime in your eyes?
Catmando is offline  
Old 05-16-2012, 07:49 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

...

Last edited by jmeng; 05-16-2012 at 10:03 AM. Reason: nevermind
jmeng is offline  
Old 05-16-2012, 09:57 AM
  #16  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Catmando
Yeah hahaha the resident OSO Nazi is so funny. Let me ask you the question again because you must have missed it;


Originally Posted by Sydwayz
No, they're not.


Me; Yes they are. They need to save money and fuel is a big percentage of their budget. They're looking at alternative ways to burn less fuel. Is that a crime in your eyes?
Mr.Cat , Nazis were socialists like you and the jerk here ;

Steve 1 is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 05:12 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale,Florida
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If catdodo would park his GHETTO BENTLY the troops would have more fuel.
wideawake is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 01:18 PM
  #18  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Crickets from Sydwayz what's the matter cat got your tongue?

Back to the thread--does everybody agree it's good that the Pentagon has given the green light for more R&D on green energy?
Catmando is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 01:49 PM
  #19  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Catmando
Crickets from Sydwayz what's the matter cat got your tongue?

Back to the thread--does everybody agree it's good that the Pentagon has given the green light for more R&D on green energy?
No, it shows the Pentagon in infested with this Braindead mentality is all .

Steve 1 is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 01:54 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Killeen Texas/Fort Hood
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course it is a good thing that they have given the thumbs up to trying to save money. But, kind of like how I justify it to my wife that driving my diesel everyday is cheaper that buying a gas saving car and having the diesel. HMMWVs and MRAPs are currently in use i the Army. They have gone through the expensive testing, they have gone through the expensive fielding process, they have gone through the rigors of getting all of the needed repair parts into the system. To do all of that for another vehicle, to replace the existing vehicle just to save gas, would end up costing more than just driving what we have. So much money has been invested into those two platforms that I dont see them going anywhere for a while. Lets not forget about the mechanics that will need the training on the new type of powerplant for that sort of thing. Costs the Army a lot of money just to train a Soldier as well. Not trying to start an argument, just saying that trying to save money on gas is the least of our worries.
Jay Gadsby is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.